Although Ann Furedi, the former CEO of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, holds highly objectionable views on the right-to-life, she is notably forthright. Unlike many pro-abortion activists, she presents her arguments openly, rather than engaging in the rhetorical evasions common in abortion advocacy.

Writing this week in Spiked, the popular British online magazine, Furedi takes issue with the widely promoted claim that the ongoing rise in abortions in the UK is solely the result of financial insecurity, housing problems, and the closure of family-planning clinics. 1 in 3 pregnancies in England and Wales now end in abortion.

Furedi points out a key driver in the huge increase in the 2020s “is likely to have been the government’s decision to allow abortion pills to be sent by post during the Covid lockdown – a temporary allowance that the government later made permanent.”

She continues: “The ability to take a pill at home rather than have to attend an in-person clinic appointment has further transformed the perception and experience of abortion. Taking a tablet to cause your own miscarriage is very different to undergoing a procedure in a clinic. Many women found that abortion suddenly became far more acceptable than it had been previously.”

Even though she remains an ardent supporter of abortion, it is refreshing to see Furedi openly acknowledge what is, without doubt, the primary catalyst driving abortion numbers upward in both Ireland and England.

Soon after the outbreak of Covid-19 in 2020, then Minister for Health in Ireland Simon Harris sanctioned telemedicine “at-home” abortions and gave assurances at the time that the measure would remain in place only for the duration of the pandemic. His successor at the Department of Health, Stephen Donnelly, later reneged on that promise and announced that telemedicine abortion would be made permanent.

This decision urgently needs to be reviewed in light of the sharp increase in abortions, as well as the risks telemedicine abortion poses to women’s health and the heightened potential for coercion when no face-to-face consultation with a doctor takes place prior to the abortion.