In his newly released autobiography Speaking My Mind, former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar devotes considerable space to the subject of abortion.

His remarks on the topic, for the most part, resemble a string of rehearsed talking points – inconsistent in logic and values, like someone scrambling to defend what he knows deep down is an indefensible stance to maintain.

One of the more revealing sections on the issue is where he addresses former Tánaiste Simon Coveney’s reservations about the 2018 referendum proposal and how he was subsequently won over.

Suggesting that Varadkar was guided more by political calculus than principle, he says, referring to Coveney: “His support [for the referendum] was crucial, not just because we now presented a united front, but also because he spoke to and for the more socially conservative elements of the party and could reassure them.”

He notes that one factor in winning Coveney’s support was the commitment that before an abortion took place, women would have to have “two consultations with a doctor who would advise them on other options.”

Like lots of other political promises that were made at the time and broken, we know for a fact that women accessing abortion today are not as a matter of course informed about the “other options” or the supports available should they decide to continue the pregnancy. This fact is not something that has recently come to light – it was known when Varadkar and Coveney were still in office and chose to do nothing about it.

Varadkar’s borrowed slogan from the Bill Clinton playbook – wanting abortion to be “safe, legal and rare” – rings very hollow today. Sadly, when Taoiseach, he helped usher in one of the most extreme abortion laws anywhere in the world – a regime that permits late-term abortion, resulting in babies sometimes surviving the procedure, and where no clear protocols exist to ensure these babies are given the medical care they’re entitled to, if there’s any compassion left in us as a country.

One would hope that, in time, the former Taoiseach might reflect more seriously on the part he played in opening the door to such a deeply unjust and inhumane law.