15.12.2010 Background to R -v- R (Frozen Human Embryos) Case
15.12.2010 Background to R -v- R (Frozen Human Embryos) Case
Pro Life Campaign comments on R -v- R (Frozen Human Embryos) Case
R –V- R Judgment issued by Supreme Court on 15th December 2009
15th December 2010
In R v. R, a woman sued her estranged husband for refusing to let her implant frozen embryos which were held in a Dublin IVF clinic.
In 2002, the woman and her husband decided to undergo IVF treatment. The husband signed a form at the Dublin clinic affirming he would act as the father of any children born as a result. 6 viable embryos were produced, 3 of whom were implanted; the remaining three were frozen. The IVF was successful, and the woman gave birth to a baby girl in October 2002. Three months later, the couple separated, and the woman asked for custody of her three remaining embryos. However, Mr. R did not want to act as father to the embryos, if the implantation were successful. "I have a right to say no. It is my human right," he said. The woman persisted in her desire to carry her children to term. "These embryos constitute human life, I treat them as our children," she said. "That is how our daughter came into the world."
The High Court judge, Brian McGovern, said it was not possible for the court to decide when unborn life begins. The High Court ruled that the frozen human embryos were not protected under Article 40.3.3. That was something that could be given by another referendum or by statute. Justice Brian McGovern said that human embryos are not considered unborn children and the couple, not the courts, must decide the fate of the frozen embryos. The 1983 amendment protects the life of the "unborn". But Justice McGovern said that voters who approved it were only thinking of a foetus in the womb. "Until the law or the Constitution is changed, this issue remains within the sphere of ethics and morality," he wrote. The judgment was widely criticized.
Mrs.R, appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was heard in February and judgment issued on 15th December 2009. The Court held inter alia that Article 40.3.3. of the Constitution does not afford protection to the human embryo prior to implantation.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.